Governance of REDD+ covers the decisions, actors, processes, arrangements and policy tools needed to design and to implement REDD+ strategies as well as technical REDD+ pillars. This involves local, national and global actors from a wide range of sectors. Forest governance relates to the institutional, policy and legal dimensions that will influence the successful implementation of REDD+, comprehensively addressing both direct and indirect drivers of forest loss and degradation. It deals with governance enablers and/or challenges that influence how emissions reductions from avoided deforestation and forest degradation will take place. These issues often go beyond the forestry sector and cover policies linked to changes in land-use change.
Clarifying tenure rights strengthens accountability. In fact, communities and stakeholders with secure tenure rights have a strong interest in investing time and resources in maintaining and enhancing the natural capital under a long-term vision. By identifying who owns, manages and uses forests, more effective engagement on the ground in activities to address deforestation and forest degradation can be achieved. Some common issues that relate to tenure and REDD+ include: lack of legal provisions to recognize customary forest tenure; lack of transparency in transactions related to forestland; costly and cumbersome forestland registration procedures that tend to exclude women and the poor; lack of enforcement of existing forest tenure claims, and lack of institutional capacity to address forest and land tenure issues.
Overall, a more stable enabling environment that guarantees minimum and appropriate forms of legal protection to parties engaged in REDD+ actions would stimulate further investments in REDD+. As such, forestry countries need to comply with international emission reductions (ER) legal requirements in order to access carbon markets and Result-Based-Payments schemes.
Carbon rights or emission reductions (ER) rights have been defined in different ways. In spite of it, REDD+ transactions raise a number of legal issues that require participation of relevant stakeholders in decision-making referring to ERs rights, in order to clarify who owns them, how they can be transacted and who is entitled to benefit from REDD+. Certainty on those issues reduces risks of double counting or double payments, allows to identify who needs to be rewarded for its REDD+ actions, and who has to be involved when ERs are transacted at national or international level.
However owning an intangible resource such as ERs/carbon poses challenges for traditional property law systems. The identification of land ownership is not always sufficient to ensure ownership over the carbon/ERs stock in a forest. Therefore, rather than allowing unclear situations to be exploited at the expense of local benefit as REDD+ develops, it is likely to become increasingly important that ERs rights and/or benefits arising from REDD+ implementation are clearly established through the necessary legal/operational arrangements.
Leveraging the experience and results obtained in UN-REDD Phase 1 and 2, the UN-REDD Programme will continue supporting partner countries to establish governance systems of and for REDD+ contributing to the achievement of the Paris Agreement goals and strengthening the enabling environment for the long term sustainability of REDD+ activities at different levels.
The Cancun Agreements request developing country parties to address land tenure issues (1/CP.16, paragraph 72) when developing and implementing their national strategies. Thus, many countries have acknowledged the importance of tenure in the context of REDD+ and have been seeking support from the UN-REDD Programme in this area. The UN-REDD Programme’s focus on tenure stems from understanding tenure security as an important enabling condition for REDD+. Each country will determine the appropriate approach to deal with tenure issues based on its unique situation. Depending on country needs and priorities, the UN-REDD Programme may support both short and long-term activities, ranging from technical advice on tenure reforms based on participatory approaches, to training on the use of specific tools and methodologies to improve land use planning or to demarcate forest boundaries.
Forest countries aiming to access certain RBPs and carbon market opportunities may need to comply with legal requirements associated with emission reductions (ERs) rights. For this reason the UN-REDD Programme is giving special attention to this matter.
Forest carbon rights can be defined as intangible assets created by legislative and contractual arrangements that allow the recognition of separate benefits arising from the sequestration of carbon in the forests. They can be linked to tenure ownership rights or some kind of control over the land and trees, or can be considered as a separate interest.
Overall, there is still considerable ambiguity surrounding carbon/ERs rights and the legal basis for trading carbon credits, despite the fact that most of REDD+ countries are involved in some form of carbon trade, either at the project level or at a sub-national or national level.
Defining carbon or ERs rights and establishing appropriate institutional arrangements is challenging for most countries. Among the primary reasons is that the legal recognition of Indigenous Peoples and local communities’ rights to their forests and land remains ambiguous and unimplemented.
Depending on the legal context and country’s priorities, REDD+ countries could receive support to strengthen their legal frameworks related to ERs rights under three broad categories, in order to:
UN-REDD’s work with forest governance boosts participatory approaches, strengthening government, local and national stakeholder knowledge and capacities on different topics:
To support a country-driven approach to tenure and REDD+, whereby multiple stakeholders are encouraged to participate in the process of assessment, capacity building, and reform;
To utilize the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (VGGT) as a guiding framework for addressing tenure issues in the context of REDD+;
To emphasize the importance of customary ownership rights and the collective tenure rights of indigenous peoples and local communities;
To promote the mainstreaming of gender and the use of gender-responsive approaches; and
To encourage an integrated approach that recognizes the interconnectedness of forest tenure with the broader land and resource tenure regime. In particular, to identify and take advantage of synergies related to in-country VGGT activities.
The approach adopted in providing legal support to REDD+ countries is based on the long experience of the UN-REDD Programme in helping nations to analyse and improve their laws governing forest, land and natural resources. The type of assistance provided varies, depending on the country’s particular needs and circumstances. Typically, a team of national and international legal and other technical experts conducts a systematic analysis of the legal framework related to forest, land and natural resources. It then develops detailed recommendations addressed to the government, highlighting weaknesses and constraints related to the subject. Finally, the team contributes to the drafting of new laws and regulations, or other specialized legal instruments that may refer to a specific subject area, through participatory and inclusive processes.
A feature of most advisory projects is capacity-building through participatory legal training of national officials and consultants.
The main counterparts are national governments of REDD+ countries that have expressed concerns about the need to update or review existing legal frameworks for the successful implementation of REDD+, especially as it relates to ERs rights and benefit-sharing aspects.
Join discussions, promote events and publications, or spark conversations on the laws and institutional frameworks that affect REDD+ — all through the online D-Group on REDD+ and Forest Governance. Already, more than 900 professionals from Africa, Latin America, Europe and AsiaPacific are part of this interactive group. Join them today!
The Voluntary Guidelines on Tenure promote secure tenure rights and equitable access to land, fisheries and forests with respect to all forms of tenure: public, private, communal, indigenous, customary and informal. They were finalized through intergovernmental negotiations that included participation by civil society, the private sector and research institutions. The Guidelines were officially endorsed by the Committee on World Food Security on 11 May 2012. Since then implementation has been encouraged by G20, Rio+ 20, United Nations General Assembly, Francophone Assembly of Parliamentarians and others.
The Knowledge Exchange will facilitate a cross-country dialogue among REDD+ decision-makers, focusing on sharing national approaches and priorities for REDD+ implementation, including the nesting of sub-national and project-level initiatives. These discussions will delve into the challenges governments face in effectively participating in high-integrity forest carbon finance, drawing from international examples and lessons learned.
Government decision makers, regulators, project developers and intermediaries with experience and direct involvement in REDD+ implementation and carbon market frameworks, with focus on UNREDD priority countries namely Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Thailand, and Viet Nam.
Register by 30 September 2023.
If you have any inquiries or require further information, please contact, Ms. Katrina Borromeo, at katrina.borromeo@un.org.
Thailand
Forest trade in the Lower Mekong region is in transition. Viet Nam and Thailand are booming as wood processing and export hubs. Source countries like Lao PDR, Myanmar and Cambodia are transitioning to more sustainable plantation-based timber industries. China plays a key role as an export destination because of the significant domestic consumption of wood products and the size of the wood processing industry for re-export. In recent years, there has been plunge in the export of primary wood products from the Lower Mekong to China. One species of particular note has been rosewood. China’s demand for rosewood has dampened in recent years by escalating prices, resulting in part from improved control on export of CITES-listed species, and the availability of less costly substitute species from Africa. These developments indicate both sustainability concerns and opportunities.
Held on the margins of the XV World Forestry Congress, this UN-REDD side event brought together governments, private companies, smallholders and financial institutions in China and the Lower Mekong region to discuss the interface between timber market demand and efforts to make supply chains legal and more sustainable. It also painted a vision of how a balance can be found between the growing Chinese market and supply chain actors to achieve a strong and sustainable forest industry in the region and beyond.
Seoul
South Korea
The dialogue connected over 150 participants comprising smallholder timber suppliers, traders, financiers, governments and project partners to discuss regional trends on timber trade, including the challenges, opportunities and solutions for sourcing sustainable timber in the region, with a focus on smallholders and SMEs.
One of the key takeways that emerged from the dialogue is the need to level the playing field especially for smallholder timber suppliers who would like to engage in certification and in sustainable supply chains, but often lack the capacity, resources and support to do so. Control wood (or controlled sources) was discussed as one potential solution as this lowers the bar for smallholders as a step-wise approach to certification. For more key messages, please check out this summary presentation or read the summary write-up here.
